Doctor Who
The Eaters Of Light
Series Ten, Episode Ten
This episode is brought to you by
Rona Munro. Rona Munro! Okay, so the
only things I know about her are a) she’s Scottish and b) she wrote Survival,
the last ever Classic Who story
transmitted. But I’m still excited. Not only is she the writer who inadvertently
saw out the old show (in style – Survival’s great), she’s also the first Ye Olde
writer to return to Doctor Who since
it came back. (Meanwhile Mark Gatiss has
written for it nine times. Answer the
door and let that sink in.)
It’s exciting because there’s a chance
for something different. That’s entirely
self-driven hype and not Rona Munro’s fault, by the way: she hasn’t promised to
reinvent Doctor Who or anything. But I still went into this one hoping for a
different flavour. The title also suggests
a story that’s somehow intangible, and maybe not as by-the-numbers as we’re
used to. Ah well, cancel the drumroll: The
Eaters Of Light is pretty much like most other New Who, same sort of good bits, same sort of bad. And fair enough: the average, oblivious,
not-daftly-self-hyped viewer wouldn’t be the least surprised.
Average, oblivious, not-daftly-self-hyped viewer: "Oh look, talking crows. I am unsurprised." |
The Doctor and Bill disagree
about history. (She read a book once and
got an A* on an essay; the Doctor is a 2,000 year old time traveller. No offence, but I think most of us are betting
on angry-eyebrows.) Bill believes the
Roman Ninth Legion left Pictish Scotland in one piece, the Doctor thinks they all
died. Turns out they’re both sort of right,
as an unknown horror from beyond space™ was unleashed by the Picts to devour
the invading Romans. A few Romans escaped. They will need to work together to defeat the
beastie.
I didn’t mean to scoop the entire
plot into a couple of sentences, but… damn, there it is. Of twists and turns, there are decidedly few. So let’s talk about the people in it.
The Picts are mostly children
now, as their parents and families were slaughtered by the Romans. One of them (the “Gatekeeper”) has the
dubious honour of keeping the Eater Of Light at bay. One of these dog-like creatures arrives every
60-70 years and one warrior is chosen to stop it. The latest, Kar, sees the Romans advancing
and figures she has a secret weapon, so she lets it out, but the Eater can’t be
stopped. It eats the light from people,
although we don’t generate light so… yeah, I don’t really know what it’s eating,
but it sounds cool. Rebecca Benson is
wonderfully intense as Kar, particularly when she needs to make a heroic
sacrifice at the end and says goodbye to her brother, wet eyed and just
awkwardly hopping from foot to foot.
The Romans are mostly children
too, as their commanding officers are all beast-kibble. They’re a fairly charming lot and it’s not
their fault their job is to show up and quash uncooperative Picts; they did run away. There’s also an amusing scene where Bill
rebuffs an advance by saying she’s gay, and quickly realises how quaint that
sounds to Ancient Romans. (Okay, this is
inevitably a bit forced, as Bill quite often seems to correct people about her
orientation. Some kinds of Who fans are outraged by the gay thing
full stop, so mentioning it again here is probably going to cause rage
fits. Poor things. I think the scene works because of the
rejoinder offered by the Romans. If
you’re mad that Bill keeps bringing it up, by all means try to figure out how
else to represent gay people on TV when they’re not dating, and write to the
BBC.)
There isn’t much else going on
except Romans (avec Bill) and Picts (plus the Doctor and Nardole) surviving the
beast, then meeting up and figuring out a way to stop it. The monster isn’t much to write home about
either: it looks like something from Avatar,
a.k.a. a big dog with random tentacles on its face. It’s a properly monsterish monster so it doesn’t speak, meaning it’s up to
everybody else to figure it out and talk about it, which they do at length, the
Romans in a cave and the Picts in their huts.
The monster seems happy enough to gambol about outside and wait, apparently
doing stuff like recharging in the daylight (unseen) and causing the days to
get darker (hard to tell from a production standpoint). It’s not a very otherworldly menace, which
sells that interesting title short. It
could just as easily be a panther that feeds on all the water in our bodies, or
a llama that eats limbs. Either
way, it’s just a thing on the rampage.
The Doctor and everybody else furiously (and at times unconvincingly)
join the dots about what it wants and how to stop it. They tend to luck out.
Peter Capaldi is enjoyably (if excessively?)
abrasive towards the Picts, encouraging them to “grow up” and fight the beast;
he has some of his most crotchety moments since Series Eight here, loudly
moaning about his lack of patience and mocking Kar for fighting the beast on
her own. There’s some nice “Grow up and
work together!” stuff with the Romans and Picts; his Doctor has played that drum before, and he’s good at it. He
does get a bit nicer towards the end when it comes to his (bizarre) plan to
save the day. More anon.
Bill's argument is "Where are all the bodies?" Um. Tada. |
Bill apparently hasn’t noticed
the TARDIS language translator until now, but to her credit she figures it out
by herself; an aptness for sci-fi is one of the things I like about her and I’m
happy to see that in action again. The
whole plot starts because she’s confident about what she knows, which is lovely. It’s still not a brilliant story for her,
although Munro deftly has her sudden “TARDIS translator” realisation work for
the plot, uniting Picts and Romans. (Mind you, up to now that’s not how the translator works. You don’t just pick it up, you need to travel through time.) Besides that she’s just chummy with the
Romans, and briefly gets infected with “beast slime”. (This is mentioned a few times but doesn’t seem
to inconvenience her. She faints once
and completely recovers with a bit of sun.)
Meanwhile, Nardole does what he always does: hopefully raise a smile on
the sidelines. Shrug. Not exactly vital, is he?
The episode’s so economical (and
short – 42 minutes with Next Time trailer) it’s hard to find things to get
excited about, or even say about it. Oh
no, the Doctor is missing for days, because time moves faster inside the
gate! Oh well, Nardole and co. waited
outside. Oh no, the Doctor has lost
Bill! Never mind, she finds her way
back. Oh no, Bill’s got beast slime on
her! Open a window, bob’s your uncle. Oh no, we need to defeat the beast! Well… the Picts have been managing that for
centuries, how hard can it be? Cue the
resolution, and open a can of hmmmm.
The Picts send somebody in every
60-70 years (outside time), arm them with a magic-rock-magnifying-glass (no
idea how they came up with those or where the Doctor gets loads more from at
the end), and use “poisoned” light to force the beast back inside. This evidently works, but the Doctor decides
he’ll need to stay behind and keep the beasts out for all eternity, as he’ll live
long enough to do so. But if the Picts
are happy to keep sending people in at each interval, and they’re handy enough
to repel the beasts each time, why not just keep doing that? Why does the Doctor, or anyone need to stay
in there full-time? Couldn’t he stop by every 60 years with his magic
rock? What difference, really, does the
time difference make to all this?
Nevertheless he is absolutely bloody adamant
about this, and the Picts and Romans have to gang up to stop him. In his place, they then march inside the
portal – to do what, though? Inside
there are countless Eaters of Light swimming around in… space? Water?
Space-water? Is there an
atmosphere? There’s nothing to say
humans could live inside there, let alone give any beasties what for. Later, the Doctor refers to them as if
they’re still fighting in slow-time. That’s
a guess, and much good it’ll do Scotland or the world: 60 years is still going
to mean about a week in blue goo for them, and the portal’s still going to open
again on schedule next time.
Or is it? As the Picts and Romans march inside (together;
ah, bless), rocks start falling all over the place. Then it’s left to Nardole – Nardole! – to explain that too many people have gone through it now and
the place is “unstable”. We hastily cut
to outside the cairn, and they’re sealing it up with rocks. So is it closed for good now? The cairn is gone when we cut to the present
day in the scenes bookending the episode, so… probably? Honestly, it’d be much simpler if somebody
guessed that sending too many people through would close the portal and sort everything
out and that was the plan; it would mean a group sacrificing themselves, but it would lead to exactly
the same ending. Okay, there isn’t any
information to support it, but Nardole quite happily guesses that’s what
happened anyway, just as the Doctor decides that the monsters will break out en
masse and eat the sun, and that the
beast “homes in on sound”, based on absolutely sod all. One more stab in the dark wouldn’t hurt. As it is, the solution to the problem comes
by complete serendipity, and is barely remarked upon. And come to think of it, why the hell isn’t darkness considered as a form of
defence?
Despite the wealth of irritating
leftover questions, the episode bumbles along quite amiably. It’s directed by one of Doctor Who’s more creative hands, Charles Palmer, but the setting
isn’t as varied as Human Nature, nor the story as kinetic as Smith & Jones,
so there’s not much to wring out of it.
(Even so, the monster could do with more than just “blue-screen monster
vision” and trundling unflatteringly towards us in long shot.) There are plenty of natty moments, like the
Doctor using exploding popcorn to escape the Picts, and there are bits I don’t
much like that others might. Crows can apparently
talk, mankind just forgot how to listen, so they’re all just sulking.
Which is very… shmoo. (Except it then turns out the birds are still talking to us, but they’re
saying “Kar” over and over. Really? Not a lot of
interesting developments in crow world, are there?)
At last, Missy hears the magic Pict music that transcends time. She is moved. Which is more than I was. It's like a bloody ringtone. |
Bizarrely (but, y’know, second week running), the best bit of the
episode is the bit with Missy in. After Nardole laboriously and pointlessly tells the Doctor he needs to get back to the
Vault – and yeah, hang on, about that?
They’re in a time machine. They can
arrive the minute they left. Nardole knows
this, they all do. And even when the
Doctor’s on Earth, he’s hardly ever
sat outside the damn Vault anyway. And
last week – oh, this bit’s annoying – last bloody week it was Nardole who let Missy out of the Vault
to save everyone. And now he’s moaning
at the Doctor to get back to work!
Unbelievable. Anyway: once Nardole
and Bill are finished whingeing at the Doctor to get back – no, really, what’s
the rush? Haven’t we established
Missy isn’t in there because of teh homicides, but because of a cheeky loophole
to avoid killing her? What’s the point in the Vault any more? She’s been
out now, so any 1,000-year rule is broken. If there’s an alarm to alert those assassin people, who presumably all this is for, it must have gone off by now.
Look, give over, will you? Right.
Once Nardole and Bill shut the hell up about the Vault, it turns out the Doctor let her out and is keeping her on staff in the
TARDIS. She can’t get out because she’s
bio-locked out of the controls – except hang on, didn’t she pilot it last week? That’s why he let her out again! GOD
DAMN IT. What I’m trying to say is,
Michelle Gomez is fabulous here, relishing the unease from Nardole and Bill and
then, privately with the Doctor, weeping at the thought of those dead
Picts. Yes, I know: this is Steven
Moffat (via proxy) asking us to believe the Master might finally turn
good. Just as we were asked to believe the
Doctor might die, or might not be a good man, or might reveal his name. Yeah
but this time? Do me a favour. No one further up the evolutionary chain than
an amoeba should seriously entertain this, but Michelle Gomez and Peter Capaldi
still make it bloody gripping to
watch. That’s practically alchemy, and I’m a bit in awe.
Let’s face it, that stuff’s
probably written by Moffat anyway, so: back to The Eaters Of Light. It’s… harmless. It’s nice to have a historical episode
without a famous person in it, and focusing on a bit of history I’m not too
familiar with. Still, it’s not like I learned
anything: this is definitely history of the For Dummies variety, and my heart sank a bit when the Doctor pronounced that the threat was really
“alien”, like that’s in any way unusual. I’d love an episode that shook off some of
those constraints, and either had something properly weird happening or just dropped us in history and let, y’know,
stories happen. But they’re not going to
rock the boat this close to the end and Rona Munro isn’t magic, so I
probably shouldn’t look at it through that lens. It isn’t going to massively remind you of the Classic
series and it won’t exactly rescue the New one.
Yet again, it’s fine, it’ll do.
NB: A quick word on spoilers. That word is urgh. I know the BBC are desperate to get bums on seats, and also to out-fox the spoiler bastards on the internet, and have already ruined this in general, but did they have to put both finale villains in the Next Time trailer? Yes, we all know they’ll show up eventually, in the last episode at least, but couldn’t we have a little suspension of disbelief in tact? How good can an episode be when you know, a week in advance, you’ll have to act surprised?
This could have been quite magical but suffered from a potentially kinetic plot being reduced (again after last week) to too much talking in caves (and huts). There was a blurring of day and night as a consequence of being indoors so much and given the importance of light and dark to the creature, it led to confusion and blunting of the tension. No doubt too many exterior shots couldn't have been afforded notwithstanding the stunning scenery. I found Bill unusually daft (the excellent reasoning about translation aside), the Doctor ridiculously gruff and condescending, even rude in the beginning encounters with Kar and her group and Nardole relentlessly unfunny and still making me query his role now that the whole oath/vault nonsense has been discarded.
ReplyDeleteWith some more ruthless editing and refinement of the script and more focus on the wonderful sense of place this should have had a really lovely episode as the basic ideas are sound. It feels to me like another episode where limited effort has been given to consistency of tone and characterisation across the series, a sense of momentum and a thorough cleaning up of the saggy bits of the script. Obviously the Michelle Gomez and Peter Capaldi bits are going to be excellent but gosh this whole vault garbage has been the most tedious way to bring Missy back into the plot. It also means the length of each core episode has had to be pared back to accommodate it and also find some plot string with which to tie it in.
No doubt next week will be the genius Moffat episode reviewers have been hinting at with it already being acclaimed as perfect, phenomenal, extraordinary, greatest since 2005 etc to lift a few quotes. I am sure it will be all those but for me anyway, it will have been at the expense of the rest of the series (and other authors) being allowed to breathe and probably largely unearned by these characters as so few episodes have given us any kind of logical character development or journey, Missy excepted, but even then I fear any interrogation by Missy of whether she is a good person will be thrown away for the benefit of broad winking at us, some very clever dialogue and loads of meta fanpleasing.
Shrug. I guess the sheer 'can't give a stuff to make this as good as we can, so let's rely on Peter's acting prowess, Pearl being adored by the camera and Michelle going bats**t crazy to wing it' attitude has finally beaten me down.
Have to say I'm surprised - the way you represent gay people on TV when they're not dating is of course the same way you represent heterosexual people on TV when they're not dating. But I'm not sure how you feel about this.
ReplyDeleteIs it the same?
DeleteYes, a gay character should have the same opportunities and adventures as a straight one, but if they don't actually mention it then does it make any difference? It'd be like making a character a vegan and never making them think about dinner. Not so much representation as a footnote. The point here is to say to gay viewers, here you are, it's a level playing field.
As long as characters are assumed to be heterosexual, which they generally are, it's a bit necessary to make a point that some characters aren't. If they're not dating, and you're not dealing with something like prose, it's trickier to elucidate that - you end up just bringing it up occasionally. Which is what we've got with Bill. That annoys some people, which is what I'm referring to.
We thought the As You Know, Bob, I'm Gay scene clunked like a big clunky thing up until the lovely line where the soldier says he likes better looking men than Lucius, which was genuinely funny, nicely delivered, and the first time the scene sounded natural. We appreciate what they're trying to do, but it would be nice if it didn't sound so forced. And if we weren't grinding our teeth at how ahistorical it was (the treating Bill so well, not the gayness).
ReplyDeleteThis is the kind of episode that makes us question just what it is we like about DW. This has all the requisite components, but we were bored until Missy showed up.
We read somewhere that Chibnall plans on using the stable of writers he used on Broadchurch, so you may well be right about seeing the back of Gatiss. If this is really true, though, WTF? You can't just chuck mainstream writers at science fiction and hope it turns out all right.
I do feel a bit... dirty for thinking Missy was the best bit in this. I've hated Missy in the past, or the writing of her. (Still miffed she needed a special female name.) We all know this will end like a dropped blancmange, and yet... she's that good.
DeleteIs it confirmed that the Broadchurch Bunch have no idea about sci-fi? That would stink, of course. Then again look who'd be leading them: knows a lot about Doctor Who, and in a just universe would be mopping the floor of the DW Experience. Every time I get bored or annoyed with Who, I look to the future. Egad.