Doctor Who: The New Adventures
#42
Toy Soldiers
By Paul Leonard
War. Hmm.
On second thoughts, shall we give it a miss?
Books about war tend to make that
point, as do poems about war, movies about war, and any dishcloths about war
you might come across. It’s a worthy
point to make, but there comes a point where I just don’t feel the need to hear
it again. A glance at Toy Soldiers suggests I am yet again to
be told that war is, on balance, not
a gay romp through a bouncy fairground. But
it’s by Paul Leonard, whose last two books showed he was a real find for Virgin
Books; he can even take a ropey setup like a Pertwee actioner and give it some
class. A War Is Bad story is just as
much glittering potential in his hands.
Right from the start he’s taking
familiar things and making them special.
We begin at the end of the
First World War, in a dug-out where the Tommies either can’t quite process that
it’s over, or what’s been happening to them at all, or – in the case of CO
Charles Sutton – simply don’t want the burden of caring any more. War stories are always in the thick of it, or
in the dreadful shell-shocked years that follow; rarely do we see the moment of
transition. And then it all starts up
again, with the ghostly appearance of man-sized teddy-bears.
If you’re reading these in order,
you’d be forgiven for thinking back to Invasion Of The Cat-People. But whereas Gary Russell wrote a book that
featured space mercenaries that happened to look like cats, tossing in a couple
of lame kitty litter gags to make something of it, Leonard fully grasps the
weird incongruity of this bizarre sight.
And soon it’s apparent why he’s chosen bears: they’re here to steal
children, and what animal does every child trust? The otherworldly creepiness of a giant bear
arriving on a steam-train or an airplane, chosen to appeal to the youngster
they’re here to abduct, and somehow stopping time in the process, gives us a
series of very striking moments early in the book. You’ve seen alien abductions, but not like
this.
And there’s an emotional element,
as each child is at a time in their life when escape would be desirable. Josef, a young Jew in post-war Germany
(another unusual note) is desperate to feed his family, but also weary of the
responsibility; Gabrielle has lost her father, but is a child
through-and-through so just wants to escape the rigmarole of a family wedding, plus the incessant attention and grief of her mother. Grief haunts these children and their
families in different ways. Mrs Sutton
has lost her husband and her son, Charles; she has taken to consulting a
medium, even though she is not convinced.
Gabrielle’s mother dotes (perhaps too much) on her daughter. Josef’s mother can barely cope as her
remaining child slips further into illness.
It’s at these critical moments
when the main characters pop up, and in another refreshing move, we find them mid-investigation. My favourite New Who episodes are generally the ones where we arrive in the midst of
things, as there are only so many ways to land the TARDIS and inveigle the crew
in local matters. That’s all gone and we
get right on with what’s happening to these children, where they’re going, and
how to stop it. The subject matter is
obviously emotive – not just abductees, but children
– leading to a very emotionally charged first third of the novel. And Leonard absolutely shines here.
Toy Soldiers is his first New Adventure, but he “gets” all the main
characters, and shows them off one by one.
Roz and Chris are in the French town of Septangy, comforting Gabrielle’s
mother and piecing together clues; they must overcome local prejudices (as Roz, she begins to realise, falls afoul of racism herself) and investigate local
connections, making great use of their Adjudicator past. (I get a geeky rush from having actual
policemen in the Doctor’s police box.)
The Doctor meets Josef’s fragile mother with the intention of just
gathering information, but before long he’s offering up medicine for her
daughter and food for them both, as well as their first bit of hope. He almost fights against this, knowing he has
a bigger picture to address, but caves instantly. It’s a beautiful vignette, and very him. Bernice meets the Suttons, and the séance she
attends is filled with rich, knowing silences between her and Mrs Sutton – both
are sceptical, but they must indulge the others. There’s a desperate pragmatism to those left behind which, like the Doctor and co. being mid-flow, allows the
story to move briskly: when the time comes to talk about alien abductions, they
won’t have to endure the usual accusations and red tape. (Or not as much.) Leonard still manages to pepper it with
character and meaning. The prose is
thoughtful and wonderful, throwing out neat little phrases like a grieving house
having a “clean white silence”, and
not being remotely afraid to stick with a situation through multiple paragraph
breaks. After many books that can’t resist switching scenes, this kind of attention span is a relief.
Nonetheless, we do zoom off
elsewhere, and not just between the desperate austerity of Germany and the
quaint, deceptively lovely France – where tragedies take place in vineyards and
toyshop owners commit atrocities for a greater good. (Hats off to the level of richness we get in all
these places.) There is also an unnamed
world where the children have gone, where war is afoot and more worryingly, the
children are okay with that.
A seasoned Doctor Who fan might put up a bit of resistance here, as we’re
encroaching on The War Games – another story where people are stolen from
different places and put in a pointless war.
It’s hard to shake the suspicion that all of this is ultimately for nothing, as the
kids are clearly placed on opposite sides of a conflict that holds no more
specifics than there being another side that need wiping out, with each side
defined only by a couple of colours.
It’s not the same story as The War Games, but that suspicion proves correct. Writing war as a literally pointless endeavour is quite
low hanging fruit, especially for at least the second time in Doctor Who.
I’m still not sure if Leonard’s
writing really puts a twist on “pointless war brainwashing”, but what he does
is grimly interesting. The children
believe utterly in what they’re doing, their past lives are forgotten and they enjoy their jobs; they’re convinced the
opposition deserve what’s happening to them, and don’t give a second thought to
eating their enemies afterwards. As
Charles puts it – himself one of the few older soldiers, there to help with
recruitment and equally brainwashed – “war
is a permanent concern”. Concepts
like peace are not just unfeasible to them, but unheard of. There is only war, and the scary possibility
that they may never go back to “normal”, even when they’re “fixed”. When Bernice befriends and possibly begins to
deprogram one of them, they offer to take Benny (her prisoner) to another camp:
“‘They’ll kill me, Gabrielle.’ Gabrielle nodded. ‘At least I won’t have to do it.’”
I can’t stress enough how good
most of this is. Those early scenes of
grieving families and the TARDIS team working to put it right, and even the
horrors of war exacerbated by a brainwashed determination to do this
forever. Even when said brainwashing
extends to the main characters, it’s just another way to highlight who they
are: Bernice is changed with disturbing ease into a recruiter, but her
personality blips through now and again.
(“‘Not good enough,’ she
muttered. ‘Must have a word with the costume
department.’ Then she frowned, wondering
why the remark seemed funny. What was a
costume department?”) Her first
sight of an atrocity on the battlefield brings the walls right down again, and
another tragedy later on is even worse, as she loses a friend while
unconscious, their killers no more upset than they would be about taking out
the dirty laundry. But the story must
ultimately answer its war riddle, and it’s here that Toy Soldiers finally lets something give.
The “Recruiter” is a machine, of
course, and is locked in a thoughtlessly destructive loop for reasons that
would fit Star Trek like a glove; on
top of that, targeting Earth will finally allow it to complete its mission, at
the predictable cost of all life on it.
Lurching from the likes of “What’s
it for? What could possibly be worth all this?”
to “oh no, not the Earth!” is
somewhat clumsy, and quite uncharacteristic for a novel as adept at emotion and
character as this one. Ditto the
Doctor’s (typically?) quick resolution. Frustratingly,
all of Paul Leonard’s books so far have conceded and lost something; it’s
usually the plot, when you get down to it at last. Perhaps that’s the moment where Leonard,
apparently not a Doctor Who fan
(although come on, what’s the difference at this point?), finally concedes that he’s not
just writing a book, but a Doctor
Who book. Despite a sudden inrush of
tragedy right at the end, the fight seems to go out of Toy Soldiers just when it should be bringing it home. The (usual) point is made that you can never
go home again even if you return, using a very minor character I’d all but
missed earlier. Only one of the three
“main” children gets a reunion. (I would
prefer to see all the survivors reunited.
Again, the “main” ones. So the other one as well, spoiler alert.) Then suddenly it’s over. I was hoping for a softer decline.
Also, as is customary at this
point in the NAs, Leonard has four main characters to contend with, and that’s
a little much for anybody. He puts
enough effort into Roz and Chris’s investigations that they don’t feel
irrelevant, even though ultimately their contribution is of the “coincidental
help at a vital moment” variety. (I
still don’t fully understand how they survived their apparent doom at the end
of Chapter 15.) Roz shines here, doing
her best to conduct a thorough investigation and save lives in amongst the
petty racism of the time. (There is also an undercurrent of Roz failing to notice how this parallels her own mistrust of different species.) Chris… is also
there and is very nice. I suspect the
authors all felt the same as I do about the guy. You surely couldn’t hate Chris Cwej, but what
does he have going for him, other than being the perennial “good cop” to Roz’s
no-nonsense alternative? I don’t exactly
blame Leonard for this one – Chris’s easy-going nature and quick acceptance
among the locals gives Roz’s frustration a greater contrast – but I’m eager for
someone at Virgin to take the leap and really justify Chris being here.
Once again I raced through a Paul
Leonard novel wanting to shout about it from the rooftops, only to find myself
oddly hesitant afterwards. Frankly, it’s
spectacularly well-written: the kind of proverbial Good Stuff (like Lucifer Rising and Sky Pirates!) that you’d show to anyone even considering reading a Doctor Who novel. But it falls short of greatness in
the end, suddenly absent the patience and consideration that made its earlier
highs so evocative, and saddled with a conclusion that you’ll find a little too
familiar. Heck, I’m not sure he fully
explained the teddybears.
But I’m not one to turn away a gift, and a Paul Leonard book, painting
moments that stay with you even if there’s something off about the machinery
beneath, is something to be recommended and savoured.
8/10
Wednesday, 24 January 2018
Doctor Who: The Virgin Novels #58 – Toy Soldiers by Paul Leonard
Labels:
Bookcase,
Doctor Who,
New Adventures,
Paul Leonard,
Seventh Doctor,
Virgin
Tuesday, 23 January 2018
Doctor Who: The Virgin Novels #57 – Invasion Of The Cat-People by Gary Russell
Doctor Who: The Missing Adventures
#13
Invasion Of The Cat-People
By Gary Russell
Well this
one just had “Classic” written all over it. If the goofy title and
unnervingly ridiculous front cover aren’t enough to draw you in, take a look at
that by-line.
Seriously,
what could go right?
Just by virtue of being Gary Russell and not, for example,
latter day James Goss, you know the title doesn’t signal a rich postmodern
piss-take: Gary’s just going to write a load of cobblers about evil Cat-People in deadly earnest.
Still, Invasion
(let’s abbreviate) has some other ideas, and some of them are quite
interesting.
Of
course, in order to find them you’ll have to climb over the bad stuff.
And let’s start right away with the absolutely mind-bendingly bad science.
We open on Earth, 3978 BC, when we are told the molten core of the Earth is
“still cooling” (?) and the spaceship-exploding death of the dinosaurs occurred
“within the last million years”. A small group of aliens is inadvertently
stranded here when their mothership explodes, and we later learn they left a
series of “buoys” all over the planet to aid their rescue; these buoys have
moved significantly since then much to their annoyance, due to continental
drift. To recap, that’s continental drift happening in the last 6,000
years. Once we pass the first page, however, 6,000 years becomes 40,000 and Gary
doesn’t look back. Whoops. At one point the Doctor offers this
helpful nugget to patch it all up: “In cosmic terms, a
few million years is a blink of an eye. The core energy would still be
powerful enough way back, or when the Euterpians arrived, now or in 1994.
The lessening of power would be negligible. Satisfied?”
Er, given
that you can’t tell the difference between 6,000 and 40,000, and think that geologically
speaking we’ve only just missed the dinosaurs… not exactly, no.
He might
have got away with it (at least until the numbers mix-up) if he hadn’t felt the
need to bung in nods to Earthshock and City Of Death, which put the death of
the dinosaurs 66 million years ago and the start of life on Earth about
400 million years ago respectively. And right there is the most obvious
reason not to expect much from this book: Gary Russell’s serious fanwank
problem. It is novel and interesting to write a story about the Second
Doctor, Ben and Polly, a period of the show’s history that lasted for little
over a month. It is the opposite of
interesting to then have the Doctor blether on about his youth in the
Academy and regeneration – the latter being a word the show didn’t even use
until the mid-seventies, yoinking us right out of the period he’s supposedly
trying to establish. And that’s peanuts to the unbelievably wankeriffic
bit where the Doctor says he’ll need to re-work the TARDIS’s interior once he
reaches his Fourth incarnation. What the hell does that have to do with
anything? Gary, I am thrilled that
you’ve seen Logopolis. I’ve seen it too. Not strictly relevant here
though, is it?
With
steaming continuity dumps like the above, it’s a little surprising that the
Cat-People aren’t something he found in his Doctor Who
annuals. Oh, he draws a direct line between them and the Cheetah People
in Survival – of course he does! – but they’re essentially new monsters, which
is a good sign. Then again, look at the name. That is literally
what they are called throughout the book. Nyurgh. Did you take them
seriously for a moment? Well stop it, because they sound ridiculous,
cough up hairballs, love milk and use litter trays. They’re like cats,
you guys – I’m not sure I made that clear enough.
Even when
the writing isn’t making them look and sound ridiculous – two of them are
called Nypp and Tuq, LOL? – it’s giving them nothing to work with. These
are dull, violent space jerks that happen to look like cats. You could
replace them with people and they would only be marginally more boring to read.
They have some back-biting politics going on between them, but since none of
them are interesting or sympathetic, what’s at stake? Oh, and they’re not
here to invade. They specifically want to destroy the Earth and use its
energy. So, the title’s kind of incorrect. Wizard.
It’s,
ah, not very well written. Like a lot of fanboy writers Russell is
adept enough at the trademark characters, as there’s so much footage and other
stuff to work with; not so much everyone else. The Doctor displays just
the kind of devious “clumsiness” you’d expect, and generally has a frantic and
fun energy that rings true. The villains lean towards tired
condescension, as do the barely-qualifies-as-ambiguous characters that turn out
to be villains, at which point they promptly begin acting like it.
Nuanced lines such as “What I say, Godwanna,
is that you are totally and utterly insane!” and “I’ll get you for
this, Doctor!” rear their heads. Meanwhile everyone else spends their
time either asking what’s going on or explaining it, sometimes more than once.
His knack for dialogue hasn’t come very far since Legacy, although the
characters seem less irritated at having to talk to each other this time, which
is something.
Once
again there is a tendency towards firing random details into the prose, as if
that adds colour and doesn’t just make it more like work having to remember it
all: “Barely held
together by rust and flaking paint, the vehicle was being driven at a vaguely
insane speed by a sullen-looking man with a streak of pure white through the
centre of his jet black hair.” / “Peter, the other
student, a second generation Trinidadian from Wood Green, tugged at his
seatbelt which was creasing his precious Ice T T-shirt.” / “He straightened the
bow-tie attached to the collar of his sky-blue shirt with a safety pin and
grasped Bridgeman by the hand.” He tries to use the colour of the
Doctor’s eyes as a sort of theme, as nobody’s sure what they’re looking at
cos-he’s-all-mysterious-innit, but it mostly ends up as an irritating
repetition. Elsewhere his dull obsession with what people are wearing
leads to them sounding strangely disembodied: “A scruffy black ankle
boot poked through, stopping the movement. … Following the ankle-boot was a leg
in oversized checked trousers and then the body of a middle-aged dark-haired
man in a long black frock-coat. He carried himself as if the words brush,
comb and ironing board were alien gibberish and smiled benignly at Kerbe and
Bridgeman, seemingly unaware of the Mauser.”
It’s strangely
infuriating when sentences get it right, like at
the end of that last one, suggesting he has some glimmer of understanding that
it’s more evocative to focus on what people are
doing and why.
Nonetheless you have to wade through all the other irrelevant chaff
first. But at least you get the odd accidental laugh out of the Separate
Body Parts Effect: “Thorsuun’s
right hand slapped him across the face.” How is it relevant which
hand it was? What was the left one up to?
Hey, I
said it wasn’t all bad. What was all that about? Well, there are
times in Invasion
Of The Cat-People (nope, still hate the title, did he want people to
back away from the book in embarrassment?) when you can see something
interesting going on. The Euterpians, stranded aliens whom the book is
secretly all about, have the power to sing matter into being. That’s a
pleasantly weird idea with a lot of (violent) potential, which Russell then
ties into Aboriginal culture. He also tosses in a bit about ley lines,
which gets a bit muddled when you try to make sense of the continental drift
dating, but contributes to a pretty cohesive spiritualist theme. Out of
body experiences come into play, along with Tarot readings and strange
existences between one world and the next. I mean, in real life I think
that’s all bollocks, but it’s an interesting back-drop for a story. It is pretty
ridiculous to suggest that all humans (such as Polly) have latent magic powers,
however, since we know it will never come up again.
There are
moments, sadly quite fleeting, when he digs into the emotion of his characters.
Bridgeman is a stuttering university professor with a genuinely tragic
back-story, and a none-too-happy experience in this story: there’s no magic
reset button, or not completely (they earn the one they use), but he does come
to terms with things. Similarly a couple of Euterpians have been enduring
life on Earth (probably best if you don’t try working out how long!) and they
carve out quite an affecting love story. There’s an arguable theme of
living with disability linking them with Bridgeman, but frankly I’m not sure
what Russell was getting at there.
There’s a
villainous character (who never develops much, despite his best efforts) who
gets to live part of her life all over again. This is a little confusing
until you realise He’s Doing A Thing and hasn’t just forgotten which order the
scenes should go. (It wouldn’t surprise me.) The whole thing is a
bit of a non sequitur, but still, it’s pretty cool. You also get the
impression Russell’s having fun with a scene in (let’s just say “Ancient”)
Baghdad, which is seen through the eyes of a young man who can barely
articulate what he’s looking at; again, it’s a more or less random burst of
creativity, and he can’t quite keep it in check as he uses anachronistic words
like “cash”, but it’s a welcome addition.
And hey,
check out Ben and Polly. This isn’t a defining book for either of them,
but it’s rather moving when they wander around town trying to make sense of the
“modern day”, wondering if they still have a place in the world. This
snowballs into a bit of a theme, especially for Polly. Her story with
Atimkos, a maybe-good-but-probably-not Euterpian who keeps her around for some
reason, isn’t as effective as her occasional private horror that she doesn’t
belong here. For all the banging on about magic powers, she doesn’t do
much with them, but she does seem to get something out of the story. I’m
not convinced Anneke Wills read the book before writing a Foreword, but she’d
probably have liked the Polly stuff.
As with
Legacy, the good stuff comes along in random splodges. Ditto the bad
stuff. I liked Bridgeman’s back story; I didn’t like having a sudden
four-page flashback about it because he saw a wheelchair. Russell is
coming along as a writer, but slowly,
tentatively adding his own ideas to the litany of trivia he’s memorised.
A tedious need for details might explain the bizarre post-script, when he lists
his ideal cast for an Invasion Of The
Cat-People Virgin Film, featuring Jude Law! Hey, if you can be
bothered to dig through the book, there are things to like.
But this probably isn’t the sort of result that will have Jude Law kicking
Gary’s door down.
4/10
Labels:
Bookcase,
Classic Doctors,
Doctor Who,
Gary Russell,
Missing Adventures,
Second Doctor,
Virgin
Monday, 22 January 2018
Doctor Who: The Virgin Novels #56 – Zamper by Gareth Roberts
Doctor Who: The New Adventures
#41
Zamper
By Gareth Roberts
And we’re back to normality. We’ve had an unusually good run with Human Nature, Original Sin and Sky Pirates!, and to be fair to Zamper, somebody had to buck the trend.
#41
Zamper
By Gareth Roberts
And we’re back to normality. We’ve had an unusually good run with Human Nature, Original Sin and Sky Pirates!, and to be fair to Zamper, somebody had to buck the trend.
I’ve been picking away at it for over
a week. Zamper isn’t ghastly, and it has most of the hallmarks of a Gareth
Roberts book: comedic tone, whiff of satire, whimsical prose, Chelonians. But all of that’s saddled to a story that
takes more than half its page-count to get going.
The Doctor and co. experience a
TARDIS malfunction (imagine that!) and arrive on Zamper, a difficult-to-reach
planet that manufactures out-of-this-world spaceships. (Given Roberts’ influences, let’s just say “Magrathea,
again?” and leave it at that.) Zamper is
a bit odd, though even that feels like a stretch: half a dozen people live
there, and all the work is done underground by the mysterious, telekinetic
“Zamps”. They can literally create
spaceships using thoughts, which has the Doctor intrigued. All of this is overseen by The Management, a
strangely anthropomorphic computer system experiencing unexplained power
failures. The few people working there,
mostly against their will, either long to get away or have agendas not related to
their jobs. A couple of Chelonians are there
to purchase a ship that will revive their ailing war effort – seems a bit
optimistic, but it’s a really good
ship I suppose – and must tolerate working with “parasites” rather than
enthusiastically murdering them. A quiet
level of intrigue is had all around.
And… so? That’s a collection of mildly diverting things
happening in a dull place, but it’s not much of a plot. And Zamper is dull: the “complex” includes a gaming facility where you can play
Bingo, some offices and bedrooms, but if this were on TV we’d just be seeing
the same corridor from a few different angles.
As for the underground bit, imagine a cave, any cave, and you’re there. Never mind the staff, I nearly got cabin fever.
Zamper might have an unusual
secret, but aside from vague curiosity about it there’s no particular need for
the Doctor to investigate right now. Yes, it’s the sort of thing that would catch
his eye, and yes it ultimately turns out something alarming is going on, but
there’s no driving sense of mystery behind it.
The Zamps are odd; okay. But that’s
not sufficient to still be asking “How does all this work, then?” after
100 pages. I really didn’t care that
much.
Meanwhile The Management keeps
going awry. Who’s that going to
inconvenience besides half a dozen typically Roberts-esque jerks? I can’t be the only one noticing a pattern among
his characters: his need for satire lends them a certain misanthropic edge,
leading to unsympathetic people you won’t miss when something horrible
(inevitably) happens to them. While it’s
probably deliberate, because comedy, it’s nonetheless odd that the Chelonians –
war-obsessed tortoises who would literally kill you as soon as look at you –
engender more sympathy and interest than their victims. The elderly Hezzka spends a portion of the
book with Bernice, and consequently softens his attitude towards “parasites”;
their scenes are easily the high points.
There’s literally not much else
to write home about. The Doctor potters
through caves with a zoologist named Smith (bit unfortunate so soon after Human
Nature, but oh well), raising questions about Zamps and then in due course,
answering them. Bernice doesn’t find her
feet until she stumbles across Hezzka, wounded by a devious Zamper worker. Roz and Chris fall squarely into “that other
one” territory, especially Chris – seen comically in his pants, or resembling
an enthusiastic dog, or a small boy, the sum total of him is a quite affable
hat-stand that moves. Roz displays the
hard-nosed unsociability of a Dragnet cop and little of the wit. There’s something rather sad about her, as
this capable and no-nonsense woman struggles to find her place within the
TARDIS team. Some of which is deliberate
and all of which I know we’re going to have to like or lump in these
post-Original Sin books, as the authors try to find a use for them. Let’s just be grateful Chris and Roz aren’t competing
for the job.
All this pottering about and
vaguely wondering why the lights keep flicking on and off does culminate in A
Bad Thing That Must Be Stopped, thank goodness, i.e. the evolution of the Zamps
into something malevolent – but there’s a note of just shrugging and doing
what’s expected here, as it turns out the Doctor was wrong to look for the best in this emergent species, and the
villainous “loops” (difficult not to picture a lot of snarling lassoes) talk in
the time-honoured manner of a really insufferable “hilarious” bad guy. (It’s all “nincompoop” this and “toodle-oo”
that, combined with bloody rampaging, because
unexplored-realms-of-space-and-time.) A
moment where the Doctor appears ready to sacrifice himself and an entire
Chelonian fleet is almost dramatic, until it’s undercut by the strange observation
that “in the universal scheme of things
he was important, and owed it to others as well as to himself to stay alive”. (That’s how the reader and, I suppose, Doctor Who feels on the subject, but
him?) It doesn’t feel so much like
nodding towards the Doctor’s Machiavellian schemes as saying “that Doctor guy
sure is a weasel, apparently!”
Once again I sound more miffed
now than I was when I read it. I almost
longed to be really, properly annoyed – anything to get those pages turning
faster. I don’t know what’s more of an
issue: the way Zamper can’t rouse a
care for anyone it’s about, suggesting the cold and overpopulated nadir of the Eric
Saward era, or the dandelion-picking pace.
They make an unfortunate combination, holding Zamper back from the jolly romp its short-and-silly name suggests,
and making me grateful that Roberts is sticking to Missing Adventures from here
on.
5/10
Labels:
Bookcase,
Doctor Who,
Gareth Roberts,
New Adventures,
Seventh Doctor,
Virgin
Thursday, 28 December 2017
I Don't Want To Glow
Doctor Who
Twice Upon A Time
2017 Christmas Special
Twice Upon A Time
2017 Christmas Special
Here we are again, huh?
Another era over. And just like last time, there doesn’t seem to be
anything left to say about it or to cap off. Steven Moffat seemed ready
to follow Matt Smith out the door when he wrote The Time Of The Doctor, filling
it with references and sort-of-but-not-really tying up loose ends, but the
fiftieth anniversary Special went better than expected and he got a second wind
hiring Peter Capaldi to follow Smith. At that point, things seemed like
they might get interesting again.
![]() |
| Day 1, practicing his David Bradley. |
And they... sort of did? The Twelfth Doctor (also the Thirteenth,
Fourteenth or First Mk II, cheers Steven) was abrasive, rude and difficult.
He consequently spent Series Eight wondering if he really was a good man after all. When it turned out this was in fact still Doctor Who, so duh-on-a-stick the Doctor is still a goodie
(despite inexplicably being a prick now), things went sharply the other way: he
got a hoodie, a guitar and (nyurgh) sonic sunglasses. A softer, like
totally rad Twelfth Doctor was born, one who could dazzle a room and
change people’s minds with Youtube-worthy speeches. It wasn’t subtle, and
it made the whole Year Of The Douchebag seem curiously pointless, but Capaldi
was still too good to pass up. He waded through imperfect scripts and
usually got something good out of them. (And
he finally got a hands-down classic episode, though for me it remains his only
one.)
Sure enough, the scripts stayed
largely flimflam and balls. Did anyone think recasting the lead would fix
that? We still had a showrunner obsessed with cool-sounding, ultimately
dead-end arcs, a Mary Sue companion who held ridiculous sway over the Doctor
and a permanent reservation for Mark Gatiss, no questions asked. Moffat
continued to put his mucky stamp on the show’s history at every opportunity, asking silly questions where we can all guess the answers, and the stakes only seemed to
get smaller. Series 10 refreshed some of these elements, particularly
with a new companion who was recognisably from Earth, but other shortcomings remained
the same. It wasn’t much of an era for
Capaldi (who still seems like the new guy to me), and now he’s off, which just
seems like the thing you do after three series rather than a natural progression
for him. (Not that he has been here three years; let’s not forget 2016, The Year Of One Episode.) He’d have already gone in The Doctor Falls if
we didn’t need a Christmas Special, so here we are again, putting his golden
jazz hands on hold for one more hour. As it happens, “on hold for one
more hour” is a fairly accurate synopsis for Twice Upon A Time.
The Doctor doesn’t want to
regenerate. “Ah,” I hear you say, “this
again.” For the Tenth Doctor famously
Didn’t Want To Go, which seemed overly dramatic at first but was actually in character for him. (Even that time he was a different species.) It’s a fear of
death, and we can all relate. But that
kind of psychological scaffolding isn’t in place this time. The Twelfth Doctor never seemed like he had
an issue with change (ahem, hoodies),
if anything he’s quite pragmatic and unsentimental, so he’s probably quite
likely to just get on with the switch. Alas,
it’s not just a new Doctor he’s got a problem with, it’s continuing to live at all. Eh?
He wants to die?! Not so relatable. There’s nothing wrong with him making a
principled stand, but it would be nice if they’d properly set it up first. Okay, there is a hint of no-more-regeneration ennui right back in his first episode when he confronts the Half-Face Man; also Heaven Sent memorably relates the gruelling process of regenerating ad infinitum, although that was a time-loop and it’s not exactly clear whether he remembers it, since he says he’s 2,000 years old here. These bits do hint towards not wanting to go on any more, but he doesn’t actually talk about it all that much apart from there, and seems pretty zesty in general. Transparently the only reason he’s stamping
his foot now is that we need to squeeze another episode out of him first.
![]() |
| Speaking of transparent: the Testimony. Delivering the best pain relief on New Earth! |
To help said foot-stamping along
we have a juicy parallel: the First Doctor himself, sort of, pottering around
the South Pole and also refusing to regenerate.
This doesn’t fit what we know about him – our Doctor even points that
out! – but I can see how having another Doctor suffer the same crisis might
give it some credence. It’s cheating,
but what else is he going to do? It’s
also somewhat redundant as we know
both of them are going to regenerate, but it could be compelling to watch them
come to terms with it. However, there’s
bonus redundancy: the First Doctor is played by David Bradley, who dramatized
William Hartnell’s exit from the show in An Adventure In Space And Time. Hartnell, too, didn’t want to go. (Thanks to Mark Gatiss’s mawkish and
revisionist script, he even said David Tennant’s final line to ram it
home.) In other words, you’ve seen David
Bradley go through these motions – and more affectingly so, as the stakes made
more sense for the actor than they do for the character. (The Doctor’s a Time Lord, and while
regeneration must be scary as hell, especially the first time, a figurative gun
to his head is not obviously more appealing.
And that’s what not going through with it means.)
If peculiar characterisation of
the First Doctor is going to be an issue for you, locate your nearest
exit. Twice Upon A Time has some odd
ideas about William Hartnell’s time on the show, knotting together his real
life irritability with certain red flag moments like threatening Susan with a
“jolly good smacked bottom” to create an embarrassing, frequently non-PC
stereotype. This Doctor is so out of
time – chuckling at remarks about women being “made of glass”, casually
explaining that Polly is there to clean the TARDIS – that Capaldi-Doc keeps having
to apologise for him. As with his shared
refusal to regenerate giving us a convenient “this totally makes sense you guys” comparison, it’s a lazy straw man to
show how far we’ve come, and it’s astonishingly unearned.
In the first place, Hartnell wasn’t
like this: he could be equal-opportunities blunt with people, but some of that
was the actor rather than the character, and any of this sexist rubbish would
have rightly earned him a black eye from Barbara or an intervention from Verity
Lambert. More importantly, if any era of
the show has given us sexism and a
juvenile obsession with stereotypes, it’s Steven Moffat’s. We’ve had the Eleventh Doctor lusting after
Clara’s arse, Amy wanting to shag her duplicate, River Song highlighting The
Differences Between Men And Women – Am I Right, Girls? and a general sitcom-esque
objectification of females. (No, making
them magically better-than-men is not a compliment.) It’s the reason I’m very grateful Moffat
isn’t the guy writing the first female Doctor, as it would likely be about as
empowering as Roy Chubby Brown.
Considering Bradley-Doc is largely here for the fan-service, it’s an
utterly bizarre move to then insult him, especially for things either misunderstood
or taken out of context. (The “smacked
bottom” remark came right before his granddaughter left the show; infantilising
her probably came out of desperation to keep her.)
If you want to be charitable (again), Bradley-Doc’s behaviour can be interpreted as a finger-wagging response to those outraged by a female Doctor, showing the worst knee-jerk response for the silliness it is. However, they do this by misrepresenting the show’s own past (and annoying people who like Hartnell), risk irritating people who are concerned about Jodie Whittaker but aren’t raging misogynists, and it all sounds completely insincere coming from the Coupling guy anyway. So I’m not on board this particular train of thought.
If you want to be charitable (again), Bradley-Doc’s behaviour can be interpreted as a finger-wagging response to those outraged by a female Doctor, showing the worst knee-jerk response for the silliness it is. However, they do this by misrepresenting the show’s own past (and annoying people who like Hartnell), risk irritating people who are concerned about Jodie Whittaker but aren’t raging misogynists, and it all sounds completely insincere coming from the Coupling guy anyway. So I’m not on board this particular train of thought.
![]() |
| "You'll not mind me saying this, since lots of my friends are black..." |
As for Bradley, his obvious
talents and accolades notwithstanding, I wasn’t convinced by him as Hartnell in
the docudrama and I’m still not. His
cadence is quite different, he’s breathless and vaguely amiable, the loveable
waspishness is absent; he holds onto his lapels as if his life depended on it,
which ends up looking a bit desperate, like Churchill always having a cigar in
his gob. Between him being
mischaracterised and Capaldi having his unearned end-of-life crisis, the whole
thing has roughly as much depth as Time Crash.
We get the same level of gags with a Classic Doctor mocking new Who tropes, such as the screwdriver, the
sunglasses and Capaldi’s rock star grandstanding; Bradley is right to mock them,
but it’s no good just serving up your own shortcomings if you’re not able to
rise above them. All it does is make
Capaldi look like a collection of stupid habits.
The entire episode can’t just be
a refusal to regenerate followed by a shrug and an “Oh well, I guess I’ll
regenerate then”, particularly as it’s instantly obvious to Capaldi that
Bradley snuffing it would erase him anyway.
Sure enough, there’s no real discussion to be had on the subject: they
admit they’re a bit scared, cheer up and then it’s time to go. So time goes a bit wonky, and Mark Gatiss
arrives as an unintentionally Hitler-esque First World War soldier, who is also
about to die. He’s been taken out of time,
or rather some aliens are trying to put him back
in his proper time because of the Doctors not dying, possibly – it’s not very
clear what he’s doing in the South Pole, but the Testimony are keen to get
things moving deathwards. They are a
futuristic database who come to all of us when we die, for reasons the Doctor immediately
assumes to be sinister. He is keen to
keep the Captain alive, which provides a sort of parallel to his own situation. I’m not sure it’s needed with Bradley having
literally the same crisis right next to him, and the character’s happy ending scuppers any parallel about accepting your own death, but let’s face it, it’s a gig for
Gatiss. He’s rather good here, although
the repeated “I’m not really following all this” gag doesn’t appreciate in
value. The notably nameless character
does end up in fanwank territory, inevitably, retconning the Doctor’s
relationship with one old friend as something he always intended; like all of
Moffat’s retcons, it doesn’t actually fit and you’ll instantly file it under
“Nope”, but hey, it’s his last episode!
Also here: Bill. Sort of.
Because this is Moffat Who and
nobody ever dies, Bill already survived her own demise in The Doctor Falls,
flying into space with Heather. This
isn’t the same Bill – it’s a collection of memories created by the Testimony, which
she argues is exactly the same as Bill anyway.
(There’s a bigger discussion to be had there, which we of course
skip.) Much like Clara hanging around
with Smith before he regenerated, Bill is a latecomer and doesn’t have that
strong a bond with the Doctor, and there’s not much left to say besides her
telling him to regenerate, and also having some awkward downtime with
Bradley-Doc. In some of Pearl Mackie’s
most forced dialogue, she quizzes the First Doctor on why he left Gallifrey and
what he was running to, which
Bradley/Moffat promptly points out is a brilliant question and not just a
nothingy way to ask the same thing again.
Yes, we get another examination of the Doctor’s history, followed by
another summary of how wonderful and cuddly and gumdrops he really is. (Provided you ignore all the sexist
comments.) It made me realise just how
much time Moffat has spent revising and repeating the basic tenets of the show
and obsessively trying to own them, and not for the first time, it made me
clock-watch.
![]() |
"I left Gallifrey, of course, to get a bit of peace and quiet! Women, you see.
Also they can't drive."
|
Bill also restores the Doctor’s
memory of Clara, i.e. gets Jenna Coleman in for a cameo, which is also a bit
like Smith’s exit – sorry Clara, Amy’s calling!
This chucks away whatever lingering relevance Hell Bent might have had,
with its confused amnesia resolution, but it’s not the first time Moffat’s made
a big stink about something, got bored with it and then binned it
altogether. For example, he seems to
have forgotten that Clara erased the Doctor’s memory, so it doesn’t make a lot
of sense for her to complain about it here.
As the episode draws to a close,
it’s awkwardly clear there’s been almost no plot. The Testimony are apparently a nice enough
bunch, so there’s exactly no danger here: they want to store memories so we
don’t truly lose people, i.e. they do exactly what Gallifreyans already do with
the Matrix, which the Doctor has no problem with. (It also recalls the “Heaven” stuff from
Series Eight, probably unintentionally.)
The Doctor needs to look them up first on “the biggest database in the
universe” for some reason, which shockingly-not-shockingly involves the Daleks,
and gives him a weird excuse to go and see Rusty from Into The Dalek. Then it’s back to the war, somehow skipping
forward in time to the Christmas Armistice in order to save the Captain’s life,
although time was frozen when they left so how does that work? Both Doctors agree it’s time to cark it, and
the First Doctor successfully pilots his TARDIS for the second time this
episode, after reminding us it’s something he can’t do. Because Christmas. Capaldi-Doc talks to not-Bill and not-Nardole
who implore him to regenerate, so he does.
While this whole journey could be seen as a fourth-wall bothering look at a TV show that must
go on and on like no other, in that arena it’s scuppered by Heaven Sent, which said all of that already.
But you can hardly blame Moffat
for having nothing left to say. This episode,
after all, is stalling. With no great
threat to kill the Doctor (it happened in The Doctor Falls, and frankly it was
disappointing), this is the over-extended farewell tour from The End Of Time,
stretched to a whole episode. You’re here
for the regeneration scene. Finally, it
comes, and it’s just as noticeably out of puff as the rest of it, not helped by
treating regeneration as something you can virtually ignore, save for one scene
where Capaldi gets a slight cramp. When it comes to the famous last words, Moffat already wrote a beautiful speech about regeneration in
Matt’s (otherwise pretty wretched) send-off: all about looking at your past and
accepting that was all you, but it isn’t you now, it was poignant and apt, and troubled the fourth wall only a
little. What else is there to say,
especially with no one to say it to? So
Capaldi, a Doctor now known mostly for speeches and grandly pointing
at things, reels off an overcooked confection of Terrance Dicks, Bertrand Russell
and Capaldi’s own remarks at a convention, which merrily puts a fist through
the fourth wall. (Granted, “only children
can hear my name” probably sounded great in front of adoring fans, but it’s doolally coming
from the Doctor, who is not prone to self-mythologizing. It also sidesteps that River knows his name, although if we can now go forward and pretend
she didn’t happen, I’m all for it.)
![]() |
First drafts included: "Fandabbydozy!"
"Eh bah gum, I got new eyebrows I 'ave!"
"They're pickin' us off, one by one!"
|
Push finally comes to shove and
we’re reminded how far Peter Capaldi has come from the unpleasant guy of Series
Eight. Or possibly we’re just ignoring it; they
didn’t have to write him that way in the first place, and they just twisted him
180 degrees afterwards. His era was
consequently all over the place. But he’s
a ferociously good actor, and while the mean stuff was a bad fit for the
Doctor, those pricklier moments were always interesting to watch. (Look at Dark Water when he coldly ignores
Clara’s threats, or Face The Raven when he brutally snaps at Ashildr, or any
time he smiles, looking like a dinosaur on the hunt.) Capaldi has always been better than the
material, sometimes sailing above it (“I am the Doctor and this is my spoon”), but
Twice Upon A Time doesn’t give him enough to deliver anything heart-rending. A vague moral wobble complete with standard
issue terrible jokes (“You’re the very first Dalek to get naked for me”) and a
handful of good ones (“I assumed I’d get… younger.” “I am younger!”),
it’s as empty and twee as its title. So long, Angry Eyebrows. We’ll always have Heaven Sent. And toodle-oo, Moffat. Cheers for the good episodes.
Over to you, Chris and Jodie, for
the one bit of the episode people will be talking about for the next year. What of the new guy? (Gal.
Person. The new Doctor, right, there we are.) Jodie Whittaker makes a likeably goony face
on seeing her reflection, which some have taken to point us in a David Tennant
direction, but her first words are about as inspiring as Capaldi’s last: “Oh,
brilliant!” (Hey, at least we’re spared
the “I’ve-got-new-[blank]” gag, but this is still barely above a pleased grunt.) The scene itself is such a repeat you could
call it a parody: the TARDIS crashes again,
this time with the Doctor falling out of it.
So that’s every New Who regeneration,
plus the opening of The Eleventh Hour, with less grip? Would it be possible, once in a while, for
something else to happen during a regeneration?
But let’s leave the fears of unoriginality to Series 11, with the appropriate
ducking and covering that entails.
Labels:
Doctor Who,
Doctor Who Specials,
Steven Moffat,
Twelfth Doctor
Friday, 1 December 2017
Doctor Who: The Virgin Novels #55 – Decalog 2: Lost Property edited by Mark Stammers and Stephen James Walker
Doctor Who: Decalog 2: Lost Property
Edited by Mark Stammers and Stephen James Walker
It’s that time again! Collecting a gaggle of authors, some you’ll know from the New and Missing Adventures, others who for whatever reason only show up for the short stories, Decalog 2: Lost Property differs from its predecessor in one obvious way: there’s no linking story. And hooray, since the first Decalog had an almighty task stringing tales together with another one on top, only to end up adding useless links between them. This time, it’s just a theme of the Doctor’s home. That seems like a good enough excuse to collect a bunch of short stories, and it could lead to some interesting places. Such as…
Edited by Mark Stammers and Stephen James Walker
It’s that time again! Collecting a gaggle of authors, some you’ll know from the New and Missing Adventures, others who for whatever reason only show up for the short stories, Decalog 2: Lost Property differs from its predecessor in one obvious way: there’s no linking story. And hooray, since the first Decalog had an almighty task stringing tales together with another one on top, only to end up adding useless links between them. This time, it’s just a theme of the Doctor’s home. That seems like a good enough excuse to collect a bunch of short stories, and it could lead to some interesting places. Such as…
*
Vortex Of Fear
by Gareth Roberts
As with the first Decalog, we
begin with the Second Doctor. Gareth
Roberts delivers a surprisingly dark vignette about a hotel suspended in the
time vortex, where you can exist just long enough to evade certain tax
laws. The TARDIS bumps into it and the
Doctor and co. get out to investigate, only to find a complicated paradox
playing out ad infinitum. It doesn’t
exactly dwell on the subject of home; a reference to the vortex being where the
Doctor belongs is sufficiently throwaway that it could have been added later.
This works really well as a short
piece, as the premise is something that is naturally going to repeat itself and
so probably shouldn’t outstay its welcome.
Roberts has an immediate handle on the characters, from the Doctor’s
scruffy busy-bodying to Jamie’s keenness not to be shown up. Zoe is developed nicely, with her
photographic memory and logical mind troubled by the shifting world they find
themselves in. When the Doctor
determines there’s no real hope for these people as it’s a closed,
deteriorating loop, he just leaves them to it.
As a commentary on this seemingly bewildered Doctor’s darker side, it’s
a lot more effective than The Menagerie, where he just causes deaths through befuddlement; it’s still surprisingly callous, even if he is affronted at
people mucking about with the time vortex, or by the general air of decadence
pervading the hotel. (Darker still, Zoe
figures out that since this is a paradox loop a version of them will always be
there. Yikes.) For good measure, the nefarious sniping
between the guests is written with colour and bile, the characterisation of the
main trio is enjoyably apt, and Roberts gets in a jolly good Pat-and-Frazer
double entendre at the start.
*
The Crimson Dawn
by Tim Robins
Well you can’t fault his
ambition. This has a fight for Ice
Warrior rights on Mars, a sinister agenda to undermine it, a traitor, a
monstrous lab-grown figurehead whose entire life has been a delusion based on
The War Of The Worlds, a huge revelation about Ice Warrior history/a plot
resolution bundled onto the last page and heaps of satire on
commercialism. (Also, rather originally,
barely any Ice Warriors.) I’ll bet this
was an idea for a full novel; you could certainly stagger it out a bit. All of which happened the last time we saw
Tim Robins. Just commission the dude and be done with it.
Thanks to the time constraint,
it’s all a bit frantic and farcical – sometimes deliberately, as the Doctor and
K9 zoom away from armed guards, the robot dog blasting away at them as he
reverses at full speed. The action is in
technicolour, and the tone (looking at you, War Of The Worlds bit) rather
goofy. For something allegedly out of
Season 14 or 15, it’s a bit too silly. I
wonder if Robins was really thinking of the Douglas Adams era: “My arms! My legs!
My everything!” And speaking of eras, there are probably too many
continuity references; big fans of Mire Beasts will give a little cheer. All two of them.
But never mind all that: it’s
only ruddy Leela! In what is, for all I
know, her only appearance in a Virgin book, she displays all the obvious
violence and lack of civilisation you’d expect, but little of the questing
intelligence that makes her really special.
I suspect we needed a Leela
renaissance when Big Finish came along, if she was once looked down on by
fandom. That might explain her absence
from these books; there’s a note of parody about her, of “Can you believe this
was once the companion?!” And K9, who showed up considerably after Leela,
is referred to as the Doctor’s best friend!
The satire is a little
heavy-handed, as we tour the commercialised regions of Mars including a Mars
Bar (oof!), a dessert called an Achocalypse Now, and the sad revelation that
Peladon has undergone a financial crisis that “forced the Pels to turn their monarchy into a toiletry franchise”. That stuff’s not a million miles from the
quirks of Transit, so there’s a precedent, but Robins still must have been in
an odd mood when he wrote this. Oh, and
the Doctor’s “home” in this is a flying houseboat. Not so much exploring a theme there as
picking a noun out of a hat. (It’s all
about the Martians’ home, I suppose,
but if so doesn’t that get the theme slightly wrong?) Altogether it’s an odd, madcap jumble.
*
Where The Heart Is
by Andy Lane
Few Doctors are as concerned with
their home as the Third, who would hate to admit he belonged on Earth. Andy Lane attacks this
sideways, never outright saying the Doctor belongs here but focusing on the
home of the UNIT Family instead, which he helped build and which, of course,
belongs to him. It also plugs a
continuity gap that has never occurred to me: how UNIT suddenly ended up with a
country house for its headquarters. But
don’t worry about it disappearing into fanwank, despite the plethora of
references.
Lane puts the Brigadier in a
tight spot when UNIT’s funding dries up and the government threatens to hand
the whole thing over to the Marines. The
Doctor and Jo have captured a flamboyant alien masquerading as a doctor (draw
your own inference!), and despite its murderous crimes it may be able to help. The writing is sublimely character-based, particularly
as the Brigadier stares an uncertain future in the face and the Doctor (in a
testy mood) tries to get one over on him by capturing the alien as easily as
possible. Both characters are fleshed
out more convincingly in 20 pages than The Ghosts Of N-Space managed in an
entire novel. Jo’s determination and shortcomings are also brought spiritedly
to life.
This is short, sweet and does a
clever job with the theme. A highlight.
*
The Trials Of Tara
by Paul Cornell
“I want to do a sequel to The
Androids Of Tara,” said Paul Cornell at one time, presumably. “In iambic pentameter. Guest starring the Kandyman.” Well if
you’re not hooked already, what else can I say?
Mind you, I can barely tell
iambic pentameter from balsamic vinegar, and I have a naturally sulky dislike
for all things Shakespeare, so when I saw that The Trials Of Tara really was going to be like that for all of its
fifty pages I groaned in horror. But I
soon forgot any objections as Paul Cornell indulged in Shakespeare references
even I get, as well as some
delightfully nerdy in-jokes about Holmesian double-acts, a jaunty plot that
doesn’t just repeat the original story and – of course – Bernice Summerfield
absolutely knocking it out of the park.
One moment where she realises she’s cocked up her delivery and it
completely implodes in a single stanza made me hoot. That, and the Kandyman frustratedly brushing
off a bewitched lover.
It’s one of those where you could
spend so long listing fun little moments, you just end up reading the thing
out. In summary, it’s easily as demented
as it sounds. Despite its poetic
leanings it feels like an outlet for Paul Cornell’s love of panto – bawdy jokes
and all – and that’s no bad thing if you’re in the right mood. It zooms along, every bit as sugary as the
Kandyman and just as brilliantly odd.
*
Housewarming
by David A. McIntee
Meh. Housewarming ought to drum up a bit of
atmosphere at least, being set in an apparently haunted house over a short
time. David A. McIntee drops in as many
gnarly adjectives as he can find, as ever, but he makes the odd decision to
overpopulate it and frequently chop between his characters. It’s consequently difficult to build anything
up and none of the guest characters stand out.
Sarah and K9 are a welcome
addition to the book world – I’m not sure I needed a sequel to K9 & Company,
or K9 & Company for that matter, but you could at least improve on it. Alas, it stars Mike Yates. Has he ever been very interesting? They’re all reasonably characterised, apart from a slightly too excited Pertwee-ish sword-fight that frantically tries to
liven things up at the end. It nevertheless finishes with a damp squib and makes the villain (spoilers) look a bit small potatoes, although
that’s not a new experience for them. Of
ghostly terror, there is none.
The plot’s small and simple and
it holds together, but while I really ought to go “Ooh!” at the surprise
reveal, it’s not enough of a surprise to warrant it.
*
The Nine-Day Queen
by Matthew Jones
I only know Matthew Jones from
his New Who story The Impossible Planet, but it’s an open secret that Russell T Davies wrote most of the
finished product, so I guess this is a first.
Based on The Nine-Day Queen he’s got a knack for characters, and the
ending is something else, but overall it falls into some familiar traps.
First, this is a bigger story
than just 30 pages: an important first scene aboard the TARDIS is summarised,
and months fly by like turned pages. The
pace is absolutely crazy for a Hartnell story in particular, with things like
the reader’s knowledge of history being expediently assumed. Second, following on from that, this type of
story – a historical period beset by a special effects-y alien influence – is
quite unlike the Hartnell era. You’d
never have got this particular kind of sci-fi/history mash up, the more
roundabout Time Meddler notwithstanding.
Still, Jones makes it sound just
about right. The destructive Vrij is
affecting history, which could mean Jane Grey lives longer than history allows,
but will spell disaster for the future; this leads to some very traditional
worrying about what all that means.
(Then again, the idea that it can
happen goes against what that era said and even underlined – that it cannot happen!) Barbara’s knowledge and concern shine
through, and the Doctor’s complicated and irascible nature are ultimately
betrayed by his sympathy for Jane, all of which rings true. (See Cameca and the brooch.) Ian imitates the Doctor in a fun scene,
winning over a couple of guards with sheer confidence, though admittedly he
doesn’t do a lot else. And the unseen TARDIS
bit might sound completely batty – Barbara losing her mind and strangling Ian –
but it’s something we’ve more or less seen in The Edge Of Destruction. (As for the rather odd bit where the Doctor
insists CPR might do him fatal harm, uh, I guess we didn’t know one way or the
other back then?)
There are numerous good bits, but
the story is at its best on the final page when (spoiler) the Doctor helps Jane
achieve some dignity in death. That’s a
heart and a darkness you’d expect from McCoy, which effortlessly works for
Hartnell. On the flip side, apart from
another throwaway use of the theme, i.e. the Doctor owned a house once (gee,
really pushing the boat out!), there’s that frenzied short-story-in-name-only
approach. This is possibly best evidenced
at the start, in the by-line beneath the epigraph: Barbara Chesterton.
*
Lonely Days
by Daniel Blythe
This one at least feels like a
short story, as it has a much smaller focus.
The TARDIS drops in on an
asteroid/planet the Doctor owns (Daniel Blythe interchanges the two words –
annoying!), where it finds a lonely worker going slightly mad, and a planet
(let’s stick with that) undergoing changes.
There’s also a hint of a ghost story to do with the hologram of a woman
he (Sebastian) once knew.
The writing is at its best when
Sebastian is pottering about on his little world, thinking he’s seeing
things. As the plot progresses his moods
and actions get weirder, all of which is somewhat nullified when it turns out
there’s just been a breakdown in communication.
Still, you can believe it wouldn’t take much to push this man to
randomly pull a gun on strangers.
The regulars are more problematic. Nyssa
is mostly fine, apart from an odd bit where she seems eager to mess with time
in order to test the laws of gambling.
(?) The Fifth Doctor is way
off. Somewhat irreverent, at one point
apologising individually to some plants, namedropping the death of Adric just
to make a trivial point and coming out with general bursts of eccentricity,
this just isn’t him. (Although I could
forgive Blythe for wanting to liven him up a bit.) The whole concept of him owning a planet is
rather bizarre, but then Craig Hinton wrote a novel about him owning a restaurant, which made about as much sense.
Latterly there’s an attempt to
underscore it all with Nyssa’s loneliness after her father’s death, but that
seems like an afterthought. Despite that
and a melancholy ending where two lonely souls learn to co-exist, it’s a bit of
a non-event.
*
People Of The Trees
by Pam Baddeley
Well look at that – Bonus
Leela! Newcomer Pam Baddeley is another
one taking the “home” theme literally, as the Doctor revisits some land he once
bought (in order to protect the indigenous people) which is under threat
again. The theft of ancient statues is
putting the “People” in danger, but the Doctor will soon need to barter the
remaining statue for Leela’s life.
The idea of a civilisation that
revolves completely around acquiring and protecting land is a good one for the
theme, and it adds an unusual motive to the Dascarians, who don’t give a fig
about the tree-dwelling primitives they’re endangering. The plot is the right sort of size and the
writing is quietly clever, adapting equally well to the People and the
Dascarians. The Fourth Doctor is in a
more pensive, respectful mood than his earlier story, and Leela... well, I’m
still not convinced the writers of the time knew what to do with her other than
act like an overbearing bodyguard with a pocket full of Janis thorns, but she’s
less a figure of fun here, and she’s in good company with the trusting tree
folk.
It’s not spectacular, but I liked
it well enough.
*
Timeshare
by Vanessa Bishop
Over at Big Finish, the Sixth
Doctor didn’t so much evolve as hire
a drastic new PR guy. “Old Sixie” is the
cuddly uncle of Doctors, his Peri-strangling days buried beneath wistful
monologues and Evelyn’s chocolate cakes.
If you’ve got used to all that, Timeshare might be a bit bracing. This is original, unsweetened Doctor Six;
about as gentle as a lorry reversing in the middle of Swan Lake.
Discovering a mysterious set of
coordinates and refusing to believe Peri has read them correctly, the TARDIS
arrives by a timeshare flat – only it’s a time-travelling arrangement outlawed
by the Time Lords. It begins to
malfunction, in a way weirdly reminiscent of the earlier Homecoming, due to the
Doctor putting too much money in the meter.
It’s a bit of a farce, which somewhat suits this Doctor’s blustery
nature.
Even so, there are a few issues
with this. The Sixth Doctor giving both
barrels at Peri is an acquired taste – you begin to wonder what she’s getting
out of it – and the two of them can get annoying. The comedy is a little much, particularly
when another Time Lord appears with a small collection of random idiosyncrasies, just
to dole out some exposition. Despite
generous amounts of effort, I never fully understood how the timeshare
worked. And the story’s a little long,
especially when time “echoes” start to repeat and repeat.
But the writing occasionally
suggests that Peri does find her
companion endearing, and his flaws – such as trying a little too hard to catch
his own reflection – do ring true to the era. It’s
probably a good idea for a story, unknowingly mixing Vortex Of Fear with
Homecoming, but it could maybe have been shorter and clearer. It’s all about a fun getaway being dragged
out for too long and then becoming a mess, and well, now that you mention it...
*
Question Mark Pyjamas
by Robert Perry and Mike Tucker
If you made it all the way
through the last nine stories thinking “This is all well and good, but what about the House on Allen Road?”, you’re in luck. In a surprising and canny move, that’s the
“home” to round off this collection.
Back we go to another time, when it was the Doctor, Benny and Ace. (I get a kick out of that being in the past,
as ripe for a revisit as any old Doctor.)
They find the Doctor’s residence on an asteroid, in a “Heritage Centre”
of stolen homes that strangely mirrors the book’s overall theme. That’s nice work.
Quite soon the Doctor and co. are
unwilling exhibits, living out a strange domestic life in “Allen Road” with
Bernice and Ace as his wife and daughter.
They plot an escape and it plays out somewhat amusingly, with perhaps a
few too many references sprinkled on top, not all relevant.
It’s fun to be nostalgic about
the New Adventures, and sure enough Ace takes a moment to remember some of the
upsetting things that have happened to her, including helpfully placing this
after No Future. (PS: did you know she
has mummy issues?) That’s pretty much
all it sets out to do, but the humour is winningly strange – Russell T Davies
would love the bit about “We only had the
atmosphere fitted a few days ago” – and there’s a lovely observation that
aboard the TARDIS, every morning feels like a lie-in
My only real gripe is almost an
achievement: could Robert Perry and Mike Tucker be the first writers not to get the appeal of Bernice
Summerfield? She likes archaeology and
wine, but only in a dry, tick-things-off-a-list way. Her effervescent wit, the thing
that makes her jump off the page, just isn’t happening for once. It’s hardly a new experience for Bernice to
get nothing to do, especially with Ace around, but the contrast has never been
quite so black and white.
Apart from that it’s a colourful
trip to the recent past, and a nice send off for Decalog 2.
*
My main gripes about Decalog were
writers not knowing a short story from a novel summary, and the awkward linking
theme. Decalog 2 still has lapses on the first front; I kind of wish
they’d get Tim Robins to do something full length just to see if it
helps. But these stories are mostly well
suited to the quicker pace, and some – Trials in particular – really make it
count. As for the theme, while there’s
nothing as unwieldy as a running plot, it’s a little uncanny how many writers
took it literally or just tossed it in there as a garnish. But I suppose it’s a hard theme to tackle, as
they’re dealing with a lifelong nomad.
(Odd that nobody wrote about the TARDIS, the obvious winner.)
It’s best to remember the theme
is just an excuse for ten stories. As a
collection, it’s a colourful improvement.
7/10
See you again for 56–60, beginning with Zamper by Gareth Roberts...
See you again for 56–60, beginning with Zamper by Gareth Roberts...
Labels:
Andy Lane,
Classic Doctors,
Daniel Blythe,
David A. McIntee,
Doctor Who,
Gareth Roberts,
Matt Jones,
Pam Baddeley,
Paul Cornell,
Robert Perry and Mike Tucker,
Seventh Doctor,
Tim Robins,
Vanessa Bishop,
Virgin
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




