#55
Damaged Goods
By Russell T Davies
I’ve said this before, but as
Gary Russell said to the continuity reference, what’s one more? The New Adventures have (or at least, to me they had) a certain stigma.
They’re New. They’re grown
up. There’s a significant chance they’re
not for you, faint hearted young Who
fan, so move on. (Which I did.)
And that’s bollocks. The majority of them are just Doctor Who books, some good and some
bad, with more inclination towards swearwords and sex than you’d expect in Doctor Who. (It’s still not that much.) Whirling through these books, I occasionally
wonder what all the fuss was about – where all the big, scary adultness went.
Well, it’s here, isn’t it? Damaged
Goods practically earns the New Adventures reputation all in one go. It isn’t the first NA to push these buttons
(messrs Aaronovitch and Cartmel have prior claim) but boy, is it the most.
If you want to be literal about it, this book has the largest number of
sexual references and perhaps the greatest quantity of violence I’ve seen in a Who book. It is bonzo-dog-doo-dah dark, and by the end
it’s bleak enough that Andrew Cartmel might put it down for a moment and stare
brokenly out of a window. (Fair’s fair:
I think Cartmel trumps this one for drugs references in Warlock. And, uh, dog-related deaths in Warchild.)
It’s difficult to look at it
unspoiled, as we’re all sitting on the other side of Russell T Davies’s time
making actual watch-it-on-the-telly Doctor
Who, so we’ve all got a pretty good idea what he likes about it. A fair amount of that material is seeded
here. We have a poor estate in London, a
family of Tylers, a devastating Christmas, more focus on the human lives going
on while the Doctor machinates, and a great deal of guilt for the devastation
he leaves in his wake. As a bonus, reading
Damaged Goods makes you realise just
how much he toned it down for TV. Damn, Russell!
Okay, let’s hunker down: the book
begins with a flashback, which is also a flash-forward. Little Bev Tyler follows her mum out into a
cold Christmas night on an unhappy errand, when she catches sight of a strange
little man in a battered hat. Years
later she meets him, and he has no idea who Bev is. (Davies delighted in telling Toby Hadoke that
New Earth invented timey-wimey before Steven Moffat did, and he manages it even
earlier here. But Steven arguably snuck
in before him with Continuity Errors. Then again, they both nicked it from Bill & Ted’s Bogus
Journey.) I loved the immediacy of this,
Bev picking the Doctor up right away on their strange meeting – it’s the kind
of secret that usually festers away inside a character, and you wish they’d
just bloody talk to each other instead. Plenty
of that goes on elsewhere in Damaged
Goods.
Something is eating away at Bev’s
mother Winnie, and a great deal of unspoken horror haunts the seemingly
unrelated Jericho family. Poor,
slowly-losing-her-mind Eva Jericho has a black dress she’s saving for her son’s
funeral. Steven Jericho sits vegetative
in a hospital bed, while Winnie’s son Gabriel – curiously influential around
his housing estate for a nine year old – taunts a local closeted man, Harry,
teasing secrets out of his mind and making him run errands. Harry longs for his late wife Sylvie and
hates himself for his nightly cruising, made all the worse by his confidently
gay lodger David. The whole estate is
disturbed by the suicide – and apparent resurrection – of a local drug dealer,
the Capper, who quite apart from being reanimated is not the man he was. The Capper, Harry, Bev, Eva, Gabriel and
others are all haunted by inner voices.
Their thoughts and lives are what drive the book, more so than the Doctor Who paraphernalia you’re
expecting.
One of the book’s main themes is
that this isn’t the Doctor’s wheelhouse – normal people with their private
lives and secrets factor into the Doctor’s adventures like bugs on a
windshield, but this time they’re vital.
When it comes to shaking down a housing estate, he’s stumped: “I’d find it easier to gain access to the
court of Rassilon himself, than to step over Winnie Tyler’s front door. And there are seventy-six front doors in the
Quadrant, seventy-six fortresses I might need to breach.” Shortly after that line he gets a foot in the
door thanks to a random fire-bombing, and for a moment you do wonder if he
organised it to hurry things along.
Davies twists the knife several times, including: “These people never knew why they died, never had the chance to
understand that greater issues had taken precedence over their little lives ...
The Doctor had joined their ranks, powerless and ignorant and forgotten while
disaster swept all around.” There’s
something almost punishing about it.
When the finale arrives and all hell breaks loose – more literally than
in the vast majority of these books – the Doctor is several steps behind, and he
can do nothing to stop it. Damaged Goods is a bloodbath, it is
brutal – central characters die, which okay, doesn’t include the main trio, but
still seems outrageous after growing to care about them so much. This is seemingly the point: the Doctor takes
people for granted, and then people die.
You feel every bit as gutted and powerless as the people in the Quadrant
when the N-Form goes on its spree, killing at least 11,000 people. It’s around here you realise the whole
cocaine plot has been strangely low in the mix – could the writer have
forgotten about it? I’m betting no, as
the Doctor is so wrong-footed he never makes his usual investigative strides, and
then gets to watch it explode with the rest of us. Good god.
(As a final thought on this, it’s interesting that a central conflict
for the new series Doctor was learning to “do domestic”. He went from cold bastard Northerner to genial
David Tennant in a Christmas hat. That’s
beginning to look like a long-time itch being scratched.)
Implausible as it may seem, the
book isn’t all bleak. The Quadrant and
its outlying areas have a certain warmth – even the graveyard Harry visits for
anonymous sex comes with a group of supportive men who would, if asked, come to
his rescue. (He won’t ask.) Davies is refreshingly frank about sex and
gay men, with characters like David all but rolling their eyes and saying “Oh
give over” at anyone thinking it’s
terribly weird to read about them in the first place. David is a sweet guy and immediately besotted
with Chris – who is virtually omnisexual but doesn’t pick up on his signals at
first. Their scenes are lovely, and
David’s make-or-break joke about men having a hinge in their ribs manages to be
both a believably earnest attempt to talk to Chris, and probably the bawdiest
sex reference in all of Who. (Except for maybe Ursula the paving slab.) It’s juvenile to titillate for the sake of
it, but it’s more grown up to be honest.
This book has plenty of (mucky) honesty.
And plenty of real, every day horror, including a prostitution ring run
out of a downstairs flat by a married couple.
Lovely stuff.
Stepping away from the sex (ahem),
the most positive part of it is the prose.
Occupying so many people’s inner thoughts gives the novel considerable drive
which heightens the horrible moments.
(Chapter Nine in particular, which moves between an impending suicide
and a murder. It’s so good, you’ll
pause.) Elsewhere, Davies tosses out
enough gorgeous phrases and aphorisms that I had to stop taking notes. Random hits include: “It was a wonderful day, but lurking beneath it all like an unwelcome
relative was the question of where the money came from” / “The suit of flame rendered his expression
invisible, but all those watching knew to their horror that he was smiling”
/ “Harry went to Smithfield, always at
night, for reasons other than remembrance” / “The pain in his chest was clawing from within – oh yes, the knife wound
hurt now, it waited until it had
Harry’s full attention and then crawled out of its hole on jagged legs, dancing
with glee” / “Briefly, she wondered
what equivalent of milkshakes had drawn them into his company” / “‘I’m in love,’ breathed David, then he ran
to the bathroom to exfoliate” / “All
in all, a reasonable face, bordering on handsome in a bad light” / “The Glamour’s nothing more than a shiver on
water” / “Then she said no more and
their chances of friendship died in the silence” / “The two women meet could no longer meet without the secret coming along
as chaperone”. Despite being
genuinely upsetting at times, the damned thing is a pleasure to read.
Even so, I think I’d refrain from
calling it perfect. There’s a point at
the end when one tragedy piles onto another and the clouds absolutely refuse to part, and I
felt defeated trying to work out what it was for, other than giving the reader
a kick. In fairness it must be hard to
write really horrifying stuff without appearing to do it for its own sake –
that way books like Falls The Shadow and Strange England lie, tediously
interfering with themselves. The book
says a lot of interesting (albeit unhappy) things about the Doctor and his effect
on humanity, which all ring true except that a) he’s really come along in
recent years, so maybe it’s a tad unfair to give him both barrels now, and b) the book’s focus isn’t
really on the Doctor so much as Bev, Eva, Gabriel, Harry and David, so when it
finally comes time to stick the boot in over Gallifrey’s ancient sins and the
Doctor’s apathy, it feels a little bit random.
Paradoxically, in delving into the humanity of its characters, Damaged Goods is a little short on
protagonists; I felt like Winnie ought to have more say in events, I’m not
surprised her other son Carl was written out of the Big Finish adaptation
altogether, and poor Gabriel is forced to have very little say in his last
dramatic scenes, which might otherwise have helped to offset how creepy he
is. Chris and Roz have several tender
and thoughtful moments throughout, the former with David and the latter working
around the Doctor, but neither of them drives the story much. Frankly it’s a bit crowded in here. And this is sheer personal preference, but I’m
not crazy about the N-Form or its links to old continuity. Talk of vampires and bowships all seems
bizarrely grandiose in this context, which I suppose feeds the theme again of
the Doctor being disconnected from real life.
I still didn’t love it.
Of course I’d be insane to really
nitpick a book that read as beautifully as this, or said as many interesting
things about its characters, or felt this uninhibited and was this skilled at
executing its ambitions. In clearer
English: this is some of the best written Doctor
Who you’re going to find, and if it makes you upset and mad sometimes,
consider how many other books in the series elicited such strong feelings. It’s really something. And it’s clear that Davies was a smart choice
to bring the show back, although it’s something to be grateful for that he had
got a few things out of his system first.
9/10
Hello NeilisthebestDalek!
ReplyDeleteOne of those reviews that give me the hurge to buy the book (even though I'll ruin myself).
I've actually been wondering when you'll come back after that year break, and if you planned to review Series 12 and the BBC Books once the Virgin are finished?
I'm deeper into these and would love to see what you think of these.
As for your rating systems, many are at an 6/10 or 5/10 rarely more than 7. By simple curiosity, what does each number means? (Is 6 good or average?)
The Clockwork Man
Hi there! Sorry for the delay - it sounds odd now, but I didn't want to come back with half a dozen 5/10s in a row.
DeleteI'm glad the review means you'll read this one, although my commiserations for your bank balance, I know what's like tracking these things down...
Series 12 started when I was a bit too busy to review it (I had a backlog of these already), and given my overall lukewarmness to S11 I thought I'd wait until it's over and go back over it. I didn't want to potentially do 10 "well that was meh" reviews in a row, y'know? Even *I* get sick of saying negative things. :P (Okay, S12 has been an improvement, IMO.)
I do own a bunch of BBC Books and the intention is to get into them as well. I would bear in mind though a) I don't have them all - there's about 60/70 PDAs *and* EDAs, the bookcase cannae take it! and b) I'll be reading Bernice Summerfield's New Adventures first. (Cue hoorays, I hope?)
Re ratings, it's worth bearing in mind that rating the book is absolutely the last thing I do, and it's not an exact science. I've changed my mind a few times - Speed Of Flight has gone up to a 4 as I thought the original 3 was a bit mean. You might be better placed to assess the ratings than me, based on the reviews! If it helps though, here's a rough guide to my thinking. As for the proliferation of 5s and 6s recently, I guess that's just a perception of mine that they slacked a bit.
10. Perfect. It is everything it could possibly be, there's nothing to nitpick. I'm in love!
9. Sublime. An incredible piece of work with maybe one tiny blemish.
8. Excellent. Confidently written and a pleasure to read, some elements aren't perfect but it's still a big recommend.
7. Very good. An easy one to like, this is full of great stuff that outweighs any underlying problems.
6. Pretty good. There's a lot of promise here and it's worth a read, despite some fairly significant issues that drag it down at times.
5. Mixed. There's definitely good in here, but what doesn't work tends to get in the way. You'll remember it mostly for its flaws.
4. Not good. A lot of problems here, though you can still just about see what they were trying to do. This maybe could have worked in another iteration.
3. Bad. This doesn't work at all, some real swings and misses here. It should have gone back to the drawing board. It's borderline readable but you really ought not to bother.
2. Terrible. Possibly confusing, mistake-filled or even offensive, this doesn't just miss the mark, it's actively aggravating.
1. A disaster. What can you say. A book in the sense that it is published words, with no coherent existence beyond that. Utterly embarrassing for all concerned.
I might do a big summary post when the NAs and MAs are done to give the ratings all at once, if that helps.
Thanks for the reply!
DeleteI didn't thought of the Bernice Adventures immediately, but I'm also quite curious about them (sadly I don't own any yet).
My ratings are a bit different (mostly when I give a story 6/10, that's because it's average).
But the meaning of numbers change from a person to another!